[UrJTAG-dev] CI

[Geert Stappers]

Hi,

A few week ago there were volunteers
for setting up Continuous Integration.

What is the status now?


Cheers
Geert Stappers


The email that did it bring back to memory:

----- Forwarded message from Michael Brown <***@ipxe.org> -----

Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 21:51:49 +0300
From: Michael Brown <***@ipxe.org>
Cc: iPXE <ipxe-***@lists.ipxe.org>
Subject: Re: [ipxe-devel] ipxe.efi does not compile (hidden symbol _etextdata isn't defined)

make -j16 bin-x86_64-efi/ipxe.efi
Works without any issues for me.

As an FYI: it's now also possible to check the build status via Travis CI at

https://travis-ci.org/ipxe/ipxe/builds

This tests the targets listed in .travis.yml (which does include
bin-x86_64-efi/ipxe.efi).

Michael
_______________________________________________
ipxe-devel mailing list
ipxe-***@lists.ipxe.org
https://lists.ipxe.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ipxe-devel

----- End forwarded message -----


Groeten
Geert Stappers

[CeDeROM]

that would imply moving to github first..?

--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info

[Kolja Waschk]

Post by CeDeROM
that would imply moving to github first..?

It seems currently there is no one available to do that, latest "major
move" is to use only git, but at SourceForge.

I also found less time than I hoped to do anything here. Sorry. More to
do elsewhere than I hoped for.. Thanks Geert for stepping forward a bit
with git.

Maybe I can compress the last years of commit messages into some
sentences for the NEWS text and we can at least make a somewhat formal
release with the current state soon.

Kolja

[Tomasz CEDRO]

Post by Kolja Waschk

Post by CeDeROM
that would imply moving to github first..?

It seems currently there is no one available to do that, latest "major
move" is to use only git, but at SourceForge.

Hey Kolja! Why not GitHub? That could improve the project development
and testing amazingly. Maybe UrJTAG at GitHub as workbench but core at
SF?

The problem with GitHub was that UrJTAG project was already taken
there! Do you know how to take it over? :-)

Post by Kolja Waschk
Maybe I can compress the last years of commit messages into some
sentences for the NEWS text and we can at least make a somewhat formal
release with the current state soon.

Yea, a release would be highly desired! Maybe also good way and reason
to try out the GitHub? :-)

Best regards! :-)
Tomek

[Geert Stappers]

Post by Tomasz CEDRO

Post by Kolja Waschk

Post by CeDeROM
that would imply moving to github first..?

It seems currently there is no one available to do that, latest "major
move" is to use only git, but at SourceForge.

Hey Kolja! Why not GitHub? That could improve the project development
and testing amazingly. Maybe UrJTAG at GitHub as workbench but core at
SF?
The problem with GitHub was that UrJTAG project was already taken
there! Do you know how to take it over? :-)

Post by Kolja Waschk
Maybe I can compress the last years of commit messages into some
sentences for the NEWS text and we can at least make a somewhat formal
release with the current state soon.

Yea, a release would be highly desired! Maybe also good way and reason
to try out the GitHub? :-)

Our SF git repository has now a .travis.yml file.

Does it in the github environment do what it is supposed to do?



Groeten
Geert Stappers

[Tomasz CEDRO]

Post by Geert Stappers
Our SF git repository has now a .travis.yml file.
Does it in the github environment do what it is supposed to do?

Hey Geert, yes GitHub has already nice integration with Travis. I have
just asked GitHub support on how we can take over the UrJTAG project
on GitHub as official developers of the project.. hopefully that could
push things forward a bit :-)